Physicochemical properties, mineral composition and faecal microbial counts of litter materials in a tropical environment
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluated the physicochemical properties, mineral composition and faecal microbial counts of five different litter materials used for broiler production. Litter materials used were: wood shavings, saw dust, rice husk, coconut husk and sun-dried chopped leaves of Tectona grandis (Teak). The litters were collected from the broiler pen every week, beginning from week
2. The week 2, 3 and 4 represented the starter phase while weeks 5, 6, 7 and 8 represented the finisher stage. Results indicated that T. grandis litter had significant (p<0.05) results in terms of moisture content (15.82%), pH (6.60), temperature (32.11°C), electrical conductivity (3.83 dS/m), bulk density (85.45 kg/m3), water holding capacity (10.73%), water releasing capacity (9.64%), coccidial oocyst count (0.33 ×103 g), ammonia emission (0.04%) and mineral (nitrogen, 2.33%) respectively at the 8th week finishing stage. Saw dust litter recorded significant (p<0.05) superior values when compared to other litter materials in terms of physicochemical properties (moisture content 15.17%, temperature 24.40°C, bulk density 84.02 kg/m3, water holding capacity 14.61% and water releasing capacity 31.78%); coccidial oocyst count 1.67 ×103 g, respectively at 4 week starter phase. Similar non-significant (p>0.05) values were recorded for both rice husk and coconut husk litter materials at the starter phase and at the finisher phase. Based on these results, T. grandis litter material is associated with inferior water holding capacity, water releasing capacity and water content that resulted in the depression of ammonia emission. However, because of the quality of saw dust it can be considered as the best litter material.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abougabal, M. S., Taboosha, M. F. & Shehata, A. M. (2022). Effect of different types of available litter materials on the performance and welfare of broiler chicks. Research
Square, 2022,1–22.
Adebayo, I. A., Awoniyi T. A. M. & Akenroye, A. H. (2009). Growth performance and
meat wholesomeness of broiler chickens reared on different types of litter materials. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 7 (3&4), 209-213.
AOAC, (1995). Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Washington, DC. Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (16th ed.), International, Washington, DC.
Bignon, L., Mika, A., Dupin, M., Dusart, L., Travel, A., Narcy, A., Bournazel, M., Bourin, M., Mercerand, F.,Naciri, M., Magnin, M., Garet, J. & Bouvarel, I. (2015).Améliorer le
Bien-être du Poulet de Chair Grâce à L’apport de Fibres Alimentaires et L’utilisation d’une Litière à Base de menuePaille. In: 11th JRA-JRPFG, Tours, France. p887–892.
Brake, J., Boyle, C., Chamblee, T., Schultz, C. & Peebles, E. (1992). Evaluation of the chemical and physical properties of hardwood bark used as a broiler litter material. Poultry Science, 71(3), 467–472.
Carr, L.E, Wheaton, F. W. & Douglas L.W. (1990). Empirical models to determine ammonia concentrations from broiler chicken litter. Transactions of International
Journal of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 33, 1337–1342.
Chakma, S., Miah, M. Y., Ara, A. & Kawsar, M. H. (2012). Feasibility of using fallen tea leaves as litter in broiler rearing. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 41(1), 52-54.
Czerwinski, J., Hojberg, O., Smulikowska, S., Engberg, R. M. & Mieczkowska, A. (2010). Infkuence of dietary peas and soya oil on excreta and litter composition in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 51(1), 21-28
Dunlop, W., McAuley, J., Blackall, J. & Stuetz, M. (2016). Water activity of poultry litter: Relationship to moisture content during a grow-out. Journal of Environmental
Management, 172, 210-201.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.036.
Durmus, M., Kursun, K., Polatack,I., Tufan, M., Kutay, H., Benli, H., Baylan, M. & Kutlu, H. R.(2023). Effect of different litter materials on growth performance, the gait score and footpad dermatitis, carcass parameters, meat quality, and microbial load of litter in broiler chickens. Journal of Poultry Science, 102,102763.
Elarousi, M. A., Forte, L. R., Eber, S. L. & Biellier, H. V. (1994). Calcium homeostasis in the laying hen. Poultry Science, 73(10), 1581-1589
Gençoğlan, S. & Gençoğlan, C. (2017). The effect of the litter materials on broiler chickens welfare and performance. Turkish Journal of Agriculture, Food Science and
Technology, 5(12), 1660-1667. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v5i12. 1660-1667.176.
Huang, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, H., Wang, Y., Chen, J. Cho, J. & Kim, I. (2009). Effect of bedding types and different nutrient densities on growth performance, visceral organ weight,
and blood characteristics in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 18:1–7.
Hafeez, A., Suhail, S. M., Durrani, F. R., Jan, D., Ahmad, I & Rehman, A. (2009). Effect of different types of locally available litter materials on the performance of broiler chicks. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 25(4), 581-586.
Inthujaa, S., Pagthinathan, M. & Wijekoon, W. M. W. S. B. (2019). Effect of litter
materials on broiler performance. Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 6,135-139.
Kamyab, A. (2001). Broiler litter: A source of mineral retention and pollution in poultry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 10(3), 315-321
Karim, M. J., Begum, N. & Khan, M.S.R. (1994). Prevalence of Coccidiosis in broilers on two farms in Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 37(8), 339-341.
Kuleile, N., Metsing I., Tjala, C. & Jobo, T. (2019).The effects of different litter material on broiler performance and feet health. Online Journal of Animal Feed Resources, 9(5), 206-211.
Leeson, S., Caston, L. J. & Summers, J. D. (1991). Broiler response to energy or energy and protein dilution in the finisher diet. Poultry Science, 70(2), 517-522
Monira, K.N., Islam, M. A., Alam, M. J. & Wahid, M. A. (2012). Effect of litter materials
on broiler performance and evaluation of manureal value of used litter in late
autumn. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 16 (4), 555-557.
Mondal, K., Chatterjee, J.K., Samanta, K., Bera,S., Roy,M., Biswas,S., Dey, A. & Patra, G.(2020). Effect of different litter materials on growth performance and carcass
characteristics of broiler chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Health, 59 (2), 194-199.
Petek, M., U€stu€ner, H. & Yesilbag, D. (2014). Effects of stocking density and litter type on litter quality and growth performance of broiler chicken. Kafkas University
Veterinary Faculty Journal 20, 743–748.
Ritz, C.W., Fairchild, B. N. & Lacy, M. P. (2015). Litter Quality and Broiler Performance. Cooperative Extension Service/The University of Georgia College of Agricultural
and Environmental Sciences, Bulletin 1267.
Smalberger, M. & van Rensburg, C. J. (2021). Litter characteristics of pine shavings, bio-secure pine shavings and sunflower hulls and its impact on broiler performance. Journal of Agriulture and Rural Development Tropical, Subtropics, 122(1), 13–25.
Smith, A., Pesti, G. M. & Bakalli, R. I. (1998). Broiler nutrition and feed restriction
strategies. Poultry Science, 77(4), 714-717
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1981). Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
Toghyani, M., Gheisari, A., Modaresi, M., Tabeidian, S. A. & Toghyani, M. (2010). Effect of different litter material on performance and behavior of broiler chickens. Applied
Animal Behaviour Science, 122(1), 48-52.
Udo, E. J., Ibia, T. O., Ogunwale, J. A., Ano, A. O. & Esu, I. V. (2009). Manual of soil plant and water analysis (pp. 56 -59). Lagos, Nigeria: Sibon Books Limited.